Quick Answer
60-second read
EmailOctopus was built explicitly as the affordable answer to Mailchimp, and the pricing gap backs that up clearly: at 5,000 contacts, EmailOctopus runs ~$31.50/month versus Mailchimp’s ~$75/month for its comparable Essentials tier — less than half the price. Mailchimp’s advantage is breadth: landing pages, social ad management, more third-party integrations, and a broader marketing feature set beyond email. For price-conscious small businesses and starters who just need solid email sending without the extras, EmailOctopus wins clearly. For anyone who needs Mailchimp’s wider marketing toolkit and can absorb the cost, Mailchimp remains the more complete platform.
Free plan available
This comparison was last updated July 2026, with pricing verified directly on emailoctopus.com and mailchimp.com. EUR conversions use 1 USD = ~€0.8442 (ECB) and should be treated as approximate — always confirm current rates before subscribing.
EmailOctopus vs Mailchimp at a Glance
| Category | EmailOctopus | Mailchimp |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | 2,500 subscribers, 10,000 emails/month | 250 contacts, 500 emails/month |
| Entry paid (500 contacts) | ~$10/month (~€8.44) | ~$13/month (~€10.97), Essentials |
| At 5,000 contacts | ~$31.50/month (~€26.59) | ~$75/month (~€63.32) |
| High-volume sending | ✅ EmailOctopus Connect (AWS SES, ~$0.10/1,000 emails) | ❌ Not available |
| Landing pages / forms | ✅ Included | ✅ Included, more design options |
| Social ad management | ❌ Not available | ✅ Included |
| Automation depth | Basic | More advanced, though also feature-gated by tier |
| Capterra rating | 4.8/5 (649 reviews) | 4.5/5 |
| G2 rating | 4.2/5 | 4.3/5 |
Pricing Compared
The price gap widens as your list grows, which is exactly the pattern EmailOctopus built its positioning around. At 500 contacts, EmailOctopus (~$10/month, ~€8.44) is only modestly cheaper than Mailchimp Essentials (~$13/month, ~€10.97). By 5,000 contacts, EmailOctopus runs ~$31.50/month (~€26.59) versus Mailchimp’s ~$75/month (~€63.32) — less than half. Mailchimp also counts unsubscribed contacts toward your plan limit unless manually archived, a billing quirk that can inflate real costs further versus EmailOctopus’s more straightforward subscriber counting.
For genuinely high-volume senders, EmailOctopus Connect (its direct Amazon SES integration, ~$0.10 per 1,000 emails plus a lower base subscription) has no equivalent in Mailchimp at all — this is a structural cost advantage Mailchimp simply can’t match at scale.
Where Mailchimp Wins
Mailchimp’s breadth is real: social ad management, a broader template and design library, more third-party integrations, and more advanced automation logic for teams that need it. If you want one platform covering more of your marketing beyond just email, Mailchimp’s wider feature set justifies its higher price for some businesses — particularly ones already relying on its ecosystem of integrations.
Who Wins for Your Use Case
EmailOctopus wins for: price-conscious small businesses and starters who need solid, reliable email sending without paying for features they won’t use, and especially for high-volume senders who can take advantage of Connect’s AWS SES pricing.
Mailchimp wins for: businesses that want a broader marketing toolkit beyond email — social ads, more integrations, deeper automation — and can absorb the meaningfully higher cost as their list grows.
Try EmailOctopus Free
2,500 subscribers, 10,000 emails/month. No credit card required.
Start Free with EmailOctopus →Frequently Asked Questions: EmailOctopus vs Mailchimp
Is EmailOctopus cheaper than Mailchimp?
Yes, significantly, and the gap widens as your list grows. At 500 contacts, EmailOctopus (~$10/month, ~€8.44) is only modestly cheaper than Mailchimp Essentials (~$13/month, ~€10.97). By 5,000 contacts, EmailOctopus runs ~$31.50/month (~€26.59) versus Mailchimp’s ~$75/month (~€63.32) — less than half the price.
Can EmailOctopus fully replace Mailchimp?
For core email marketing (campaigns, basic automation, landing pages, forms), yes. For Mailchimp’s broader marketing suite — social ad management, deeper third-party integrations, more advanced automation logic — EmailOctopus doesn’t fully replace it. Whether that matters depends on whether you actually use those extra features or just pay for email sending.
Which has better deliverability: EmailOctopus or Mailchimp?
Both platforms have solid general deliverability reputations for standard use. EmailOctopus’s Connect option (Amazon SES) gives high-volume senders more direct control over sending infrastructure and reputation management, which can be an advantage for large lists specifically — Mailchimp doesn’t offer an equivalent direct-infrastructure option.
Related Resources
- 📊 EmailOctopus Review 2026 — Full hands-on review of EmailOctopus specifically
- 🎯 EmailOctopus vs MailerLite — Two budget-friendly platforms compared
- ⚡ EmailOctopus vs Brevo — Pure email vs multichannel marketing
- 🔄 Mailchimp Alternatives — Full roundup of platforms to consider instead
